tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Apr 10 03:59:16 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

ghorghvaD 'oH?

• From: "Sean M. Burke" <[email protected]>
• Subject: ghorghvaD 'oH?
• Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 01:59:09 -0600
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Hm, so much for having these thread off of their respective postings.  Ahwell.

At 11:49 2002-04-08 +0000, Agnieszka Solska wrote:
>>K: ghorghvaD 'oH?
>>Gloss: When is it for?
>>Eno/Schmidt: When is it for?
><ghorgh> is not a noun and cannot take noun suffixes.

Some things besides prototypical nouns can act like nouns.  Consider 
{nuqDaq}.  {nuq} isn't a prototypical noun, but it takes a noun suffix 
{Daq} just fine.


--
Sean M. Burke    http://www.spinn.net/~sburke/

• Follow-Ups:
  • to' nech, 004: {ghorghvaD 'oH?}
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • Re: ghorghvaD 'oH?
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: to' nech
    • From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Yet another translation.
• Next by Date: Klingon WOTD: joch (v)
• Prev by thread: "indefinite subject" and "passive voice"
• Next by thread: to' nech, 004: {ghorghvaD 'oH?}
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level