tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 15 03:12:32 2001
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: yu'ghach Daj
- From: Andrew <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC: yu'ghach Daj
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 03:08:26 -0400 (EDT)
batlh ghItlh rIntaH DloraH:
>*yID law' tu'lu'
>
>-----------------------
>*** yID is not canon. I probably shouldn't even use it here.
>
toH, wot 'oHchu' "yID" mu''e'. ben qep'a'Daq vIQoychu'. "naDev yID nuv
law'", Daqon 'e' DaHechlaw', qar'a'? "yIDwI' tu'lu'", DajatlhlaH, 'ach loQ
'utHa'. va jInech jay', SupIvjaj tlhIH Hoch. chaq qabmo' Hol'e' vIqonbogh
qoj vImughbogh, HIpIchQo'! qaSpu' poH nI'.
Well, "yID" is actually a verb. I distinctly heard it at a previous qep'a'.
You meant of course to say "naDev yID nuv law'". You could say "yIDwI'
tu'lu'", but it's kind of redundant. By the way, greetings to y'all? Forgive
me for the seeming lack of writing and translation skills. It's been a while.
--Andrew Strader
http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/~strader