tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Oct 26 13:10:12 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: tlhIngan-Hol Digest 24 Oct 2000 08:00:02 -0000 Issue 1703

• From: Daniel Sheffler <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: tlhIngan-Hol Digest 24 Oct 2000 08:00:02 -0000 Issue 1703
• Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:09:39 -0400
• References: <[email protected]>

did I actualy write mph or kph.  I guess I did, I am very sorry,  it is mps or
kps.  My nerdety is not complit!!

Eric Andeen wrote:

> vay':
>
> >> (I want to know how to say 186,282.47 mph
> >> or 299,792.458 kph which is c)
>
> c is actually 2.99792458e8 m/s, so the km/h figure is not correct.
>
> lay'tel:
>
> > Start with c (call it <<wovmoHwI' Do>> (velocity of light).)
> > and work backward.
>
> Even better: <'otlh Do>. We don't get to use words like <'otlh> very often,
> but it's exciting when we do!
>
> pagh 'utlh


_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
   http://www.netzero.net/download/

• References:
  • RE: tlhIngan-Hol Digest 24 Oct 2000 08:00:02 -0000 Issue 1703
    • From: Eric Andeen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [unsubscribing from tlhIngan-Hol]
• Next by Date: yItIv!
• Prev by thread: RE: More thoughts on the speed of light
• Next by thread: Re: tlhIngan-Hol Digest 24 Oct 2000 08:00:02 -0000 Issue 1703
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level