tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 31 20:26:20 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: Hoch DaHjaj mu'mey vIwaH.
- From: [email protected] (William Martin)
- Subject: RE: KLBC: Hoch DaHjaj mu'mey vIwaH.
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 23:26:07 -0400
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
This is an interesting question. Given the way that composers "record" tunes
that somehow are floating around, waiting to be discovered, I'd suspect that
the verbs {Heng} {pang}, {yach}, etc. would have as their direct objects the
affected parts of the appropriate musical instrument and that the musical
note merely {qaS}. Perhaps {jIbomchoH. 'egh vIqaSmoH.}
charghwI' 'utlh
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 1:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: KLBC: Hoch DaHjaj mu'mey vIwaH.
In a message dated 5/29/2000 6:21:15 PM Central Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
<< While true, the tone {'egh} of the Klingon nonatonic scale is not a
musical instrument, and {chu'} is likely not the right verb for it. >>
We have some specific words for play music: Heng, pang, yach, etc. Do you
think one of these words is appropriate for playing a "note" of music?
Xardana