tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 04 14:59:36 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Klingon Academy
- From: Marc Ruehlaender <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Klingon Academy
- Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 16:58:50 CDT
jatlh ghunchu'wI':
> One of our canon examples is {wIch ja'wI'pu'}, which makes no sense if
> interpreted with {wIch} being the object of {ja'}. [Skybox S8, Bat'telh,
> Klingon Sword of Honor]
>
are you saying, a {wIch} is not s.th. one can {ja'}?
i.e. wIch vIja'. is semantically garbage?
or what makes {wIch ja'wI'} nonsense if interpreted as
(wIch ja')wI'?
(I don't see a difference in english between "a teller of myths"
and "one who (tells myths)")
Marc Ruehlaender
aka HomDoq
[email protected]