tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 08 09:23:00 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: Hoch DaHjaj mu'mey vIwaHqa'qu'.
- From: Burt Clawson <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC: Hoch DaHjaj mu'mey vIwaHqa'qu'.
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 09:59:12 -0600
jang pagh:
> >> tugh! ghItroq choljaH yISo'. ghIq Sam 'e' nIDtaHvIS wIbejlaH.
> >> "Hurry! Hide G'trok's ponytail holder. Then we can watch
> >> while he tries to find it."
>
> ravDaq jIpum 'ej jIHagh. tlhoS quSwIj vIghor. ghu' vIleghlaHchu'. majQa'.
>
DatIvqu' 'e' vIbel. tlhIngan ghu' tlhaQ jIH much yIqel: <juppu'>.
> One grammar comment, though - you have a <-taH> after an <'e'>. Of course,
> the <-taH> is required with the <-vIS>, so these two rules would seem to
> imply that <-vIS> after <'e'> is illegal. I'll leave the resolution of
> this
> up to you, but I suspect there is some sort of other rule - probably an
> exception to the rule about <'e'> - that permits this.
>
I struggled with the <-taH> after <'e'>, but it seemed to make
sense. I guess I could have used <-DI'>... ghIq Sam 'e' nIDDI' wIbejlaH.
Or is that even worse?
- tuv'el