tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 15 08:03:29 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: transitive verbs

• From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: transitive verbs
• Date: 15 Nov 1999 16:01:38 -0000
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

Ugh, charghwI', whatever you did to send your last message, don't do it
again.  It came in all encoded, without even the usual cute little
delimiter lines and plaintext (or quoted-printable) version.  Just a big
mass of gibberish:

T24gU2F0LCAxMyBOb3YgMTk5OSAwNDowOToxNyAtMDgwMCBCZW4gR2lic29u
IA0KPGRyYWtvbkB2aXAuYmVzdC5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+IFNvcnJ5IHRo
aXMgaXMgc28gbGF0ZS4gUmVhbCBsaWZlIGNhbiBiZSBhIHBpYW4gYXQgdGlt
ZXMuDQoNCklzIGEgcGlhbiBhIHNob3J0IHBpYW5vPyB7ezopPg0KIA0KPiAi
V2lsbGlhbSBILiBNYXJ0aW4iIHdyb3RlOg0KPiA+IA0KPiA+IE9uIFR1ZSwg
MDkgTm92IDE5OTkgMDk6NDk6NTYgLTA4MDAgQmVuIEdpYnNvbg0KPiA+IDxk

That's the first few lines of your message.  And it didn't get more
interesting.

I decoded it, but see if you can stop this.

It may have been triggered by the "smart" quotes (what a misnomer!) in the
post.

~mark

• References:
  • Re: transitive verbs
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: Phrasal Doubts, QIn cha'
• Next by Date: RE: Klingon WOTD: bagh (v)
• Prev by thread: Re: transitive verbs
• Next by thread: Re: transitive verbs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level