tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 22 10:13:25 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: Qapbe' DujwIj
- From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: Qapbe' DujwIj
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:15:56 -0700
jIjatlh:
> lI'bej qeSlIj. <yaH> vIchelQo': qachvamDaq vumlaw'mo' pagh,
> yaH 'oHbe'ba'. 'ach Qapbej mu' <qach>.
jatlh peHruS:
> DaH jIQochbe'. chaq qach botlhDaq yaHmey tu'lu'. tIn qach;
> mach yaH. chaq qachDaq vum ghotpu' law', yaHDaq vum wa' ghot
> ghotpu' puS ghap. 'ach mu' {ropyaH} wIghaj 'ej wa' qach neH
> 'oH 'e' vIHar. ghItlhmey pImDaq qach 'ay' DelmeH mu' {pa'}
> lo' MO: vutpa', puchpa'.
> Oh well, again I'd like more explicit comments from MO himself.
> I'll just keep waiting and hoping.
It's hard to convey tone in an email. The <yaH> remark was intended as a
(mostly) humorous jab at the "Department of Economic Security". It was not a
comment on the appropriate use of <yaH>.
pagh