tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 20 18:10:47 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: qama'
- From: TPO <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: qama'
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 21:11:07 -0500
>> I don't think you can say "mumblings" without a {-ghach} nominalizer,
>> which it is generally wise to avoid. Perhaps something like ?{mu'meyDaj
>> wIyajbe'laHbogh} -- his words which we couldn't understand.
>
>Whoa, back the horse up there cowpoke! tlhIngan Hol has a nominalizer?
>What is its order among the suffixes. How is it used? Can you give me
>canon examples? And why was I not INFORMED of this fact?
If you have the dictionary you were informed.
We did not bring it to your attention because it is a dangerous tool in the
hands of a newbie.
Klingon is a verb based language.
How are you trying to use the word "mumblings"?
DloraH