tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 17 01:25:54 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: bItam.

• From: Zrajm C Akfohg <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: bItam.
• Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 10:14:16 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <CBD6795F70A5D211B2B20008C733321A031D88@INFINITI2>
• Organization: Klingonska akademien.

On 17-Mar-99, Andeen, Eric wrote:
> jatlh Zrajm:

>> De'vam yIlaD!
>> chay' DaparHa'?

> jISovbe'. jIyajbe'.

<<How do you like it?>> vIjatlhpu', 'e' vIHech.
tlhIngan Hol vIlo'chugh, chay' <<How do you like it?>> vIjatlh?
<<DabuStaHvIS, nuq bIQub?>>
QaQ'a' mu'tlheghvam?

>> * * *
>> 
>> yIjatlh! SoHvaD vIjatlh.
>> bItam.
>> yIjatlh! vIjatlh.
>> bItamqu'.
>> yIjatlh! vItlhup.
>> 'ach not bI'Ij.
>> bItam.
>> reH bItam.
>> 
>> * * *
>> 
>> Have I made any stupid grammatical errors?

> Since you are not saying something specific, the prefixes should probably
> be <jI-> rather than <vI->. Other than that, this is good.

I'm saying <<yIjatlh!>>, isn't that specific?

> pagh
> Beginners' Grammarian

/maHvatlh, 'upSala'ngan

-- 
   Zrajm C Akfohg    www.come.to/dark   Tel:018-500911
   Uppsala, Sweden   [email protected]    ICQ:16769663

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC: bItam.
    • From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>
  • Re: KLBC: bItam.
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: KLBC: bItam.
    • From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: -moH Curiousity {was Re: deep structures}
• Next by Date: Re: 'Iv jIH?
• Prev by thread: RE: KLBC: bItam.
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: bItam.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level