tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 18 14:38:22 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: yaSmIn
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 23:47:24 -0800 (PST) "Lieven L. Litaer"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> ghItlh charghwI':
>
> >> >Hotchuq wuSDu'raj.
> >> 'IHbe' mu'qoqvam.
> >
> >qatchuq wuSDu'raj.
> rap. It's too long.
If THAT is your attitude toward kissing, qechmey chu' DapoQ.
> >chaq pe'vI'Ha' Suchopchuq.
> you mean {pe'vIlHa'}. Does that exist?
> What about just {loQ chopchuq}?
I see a big difference. Since {pe'vIl} is an adverbial and we
know that when it makes sense, they can take {-Ha'} and in this
case, the meaning of {pe'vIlHa'} is pretty obvious, yes, I think
it exists.
There are adverbs that do not have obvious meaning with {-Ha'},
like {tugh}. Would that be something in the distant future, or
the past? What is "unsoon"? But "unforcefully" is pretty easy to
grasp.
> >> maDo'qu' 'e' vItul je jIH 'ej reH taHjaj parmaqmaj.
> >wa'maH chorgh ben bIboghpu''a'? bInajchu'.
> chaq jIQuchqu'mo' jInajtaH :-)
ba'.
> mu'tlheghvam vIchoH: qaStaHvIS poH nI' taH parmaqmaj 'e' vItul. qaq'a'?
maj.
> wa'leS maghomqa'. chaq jIja'.
>
> "jInajtaHvIS *yaSmIn vIghomjaj." :-)
batlh bInajjaj!
> . Quvar muHwI'
charghwI' 'utlh