tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 19 17:31:41 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Spell My Name Right! (was: Re: greetings)



>From: [email protected]
>Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 14:46:34 EDT
>
>In a message dated 8/19/99 2:08:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] 
>writes:
>
>> >Yes, I know, an unusual usage to be sure, pagh *mu'Du'vaD* vIHechchu'qu'.  
>> My 
>>  >name is a part of me, almost a bodypart, you might say, so I thought is 
>was 
>> 
>>  >appropiate.
>>  
>>  But you're using the body-part *plural*, implying that you are talking
>>  about words (plural words) which are in some sense parts of some body.  And
>>  yet you're only asking me to consider a single word.  Don't get carried
>>  away with poetic uses of -Du'.  Yes, it's specific to body parts and yes
>>  you can thus do clever poetic (and very marked) uses of it to imply some
>>  things, but it still is only what it is: a PLURAL MARKER which happens to
>>  mark plurals of body-parts.
>>  
>>  ~mark
>>  
>"Word parts of my name."  But I see your point.

Again, careful.  "word-parts" are not "*mu'Du'".  "*mu'Du'" are "words
(viewed as body-parts)," just as "DeSDu'" are not "arm-parts" but rather
"arms (viewed as body-parts)."  You don't say "DeSDu'" to mean "arm-parts",
right? (things like elbows, wrists...).

I suppose to get this meaning across poetically you could try {pongwIj
'ay'Du'}, "the pieces (viewed as body parts) of my name". It would be
pretty stilted, though.  And they'd likely be body-parts of the NAME, not
you.  And it would be THEY, not the name itself, which would be the
body-part (you were saying you were trying to view your name as part of
yourself).

~mark


Back to archive top level