tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 22 19:57:35 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: {-vo'} (was Re: Word for "god"?)

• From: [email protected] (Ben Mischler)
• Subject: Re: {-vo'} (was Re: Word for "god"?)
• Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 22:57:34 -0400 (EDT)
• In-Reply-To: Zrajm C Akfohg <[email protected]>'s message of Thu, 22 Apr 199917:07:47 -0700 (PDT)

jatlh maHvatlh(?):

>What canon sources states this? Has it
>been said in canon that {­vo'} and {­Daq}
>can *only* be used in the non­abstract
>senses? 

I just found something in HolQeD 8:1, page 7, "Maltz Online":

"In Klingon, however, the noun suffixes {-Daq} (the general locative)
and {-vo'} (from) express only notions related to space ("to a place,"
"in a place," "from a place," and so on). They are thus not the same
English prepositions, which have a wider range of usage."

� Sovmo' HoS €

• Prev by Date: RE: More than one "adjective"
• Next by Date: Re: More than one "adjective"
• Prev by thread: Re: {-vo'} (was Re: Word for "god"?)
• Next by thread: Re: tlhIngan HovQeD (Klingon astrology/astronomy)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level