tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 18 12:56:21 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jIbuplaHbe'
- From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: jIbuplaHbe'
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 14:55:06 -0500 (CDT)
: [Voragh wrote]:
: >: rur'a' <<bup>> <<mej>> je?
: >: rur'a' <<bup>> <<mev>> je?
: >: rur'a' <<bup>> <<jegh>> je?
: >
: >latlh je wIqelnIS: rur'a' <<bup>> <<paj>>?
:
: If the two things being compared are on the same side of [rur] shouldn't
: there be a [-chuq] on the verb? Without the [-chuq] the verb should be
: between them.
:
: rurchuq'a' [paj] [bup] je?
: [paj] rur'a' [bup]
:
: DloraH
bIlughba'. The more I thought about it, the more the second {je} sounded
superfluous following {latlh je"} "yet another", so I deleted it after I had
first written it correctly.
reH DujlIj wa'DIch yIvoq!
Voragh