tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 01 08:12:57 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: per yuD

• From: "Qermaq" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: per yuD
• Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 11:18:04 -0500

ghItlh peHruS:

>Because {per yuD} is not written together without a space, I think the
plural
>should be {permey yuD}, leaving {yuD} as a verb. Comments? Do you folks
>think {per yuD} is a compound noun, which would have the plural {per
yuDmey}?

<per yuD> is like "mother-in-law" to me - I would suspect some might say
<*per yuDmey> and "*mother-in-laws", but it seems only <permey yuD> and
"mothers-in-law" are correct.

*France* Hol Holtejpu', jItlhob - chay' *be plural*choHlu' *nom de plume*?

Qermaq

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: Film summary
• Next by Date: Re: jatmey wej vIchovqang - Sor vuv SuS neH Sor Dogh
• Prev by thread: per yuD
• Next by thread: Re: per yuD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level