tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 21 21:43:20 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: {boq} and "fusion" (was Re: Problem Words)



At 07:15 PM 21/12/98 -0800, you wrote:
>ja' charghwI':
>> >Hong boq chuyDaH: loS
>> >Impulse Fusion Thrusters - 4

>>Maybe the word {boq} covers all cases of things we
>>would call "fusion" and all things we would call "coalition", or
>>maybe the Klingons see this impulse device and consider it a
>>coalition while English speakers consider it "fusion". Maybe for
>>all other "fusion" concepts, Klingons would use a different word.
>
>The device isn't a coalition.  The process by which it operates is.

Would "boq" also be appropriate for fusion referring to Klingon/Human and
Klingon/Romulan etc "fusions"???

qaSa




Back to archive top level