tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 30 08:23:38 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: yeesh. right. wrong. jISaHbe'! (was Re: Correct me if I'm wrong but..)
- From: Qov <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: yeesh. right. wrong. jISaHbe'! (was Re: Correct me if I'm wrong but..)
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 08:20:44 -0700
At 07:02 98-04-30 -0700, Joel wrote:
}"sentience" mu' vIlo', 'ej DaH jIQoS.
rut mu'vetlh vIlo' je jIH. rurchuq *sentient* "Hol lulo'laH" je. 'ach
lughbejmo' TKD wIjatlh maqarchu'be'.
}}<< Sentience is not the issue. The ability
}} to use langauge.>>
}}
}}charghwI' is outright wrong on this point.
}
}ghobe'. reH lugh charghwI'.
...
}When I call our new puppy "he" rather than "it", when I speak to him, and
}"interact" as if he understood, I convey my high estimation of or hopes
}for his intelligence. If I were to call a group of warriors SuvwI'mey
}(assuming I had a clue and a bucket to carry it in) I convey my low regard
for }them.
Or -- don't forget -- that you could be referring to their dispersement.
}Befitting their brusque, businesslike way of doing things, Klingons
}express the demarcation thing/being in terms of language capability. No
}doubt they argue as much as we do about who lands in those categories.
Grin, that would be funny.
Qov [email protected]
Beginners' Grammarian