tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Apr 18 13:23:51 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: nobmey
- From: [email protected] (Lisa Stapp)
- Subject: Re: KLBC: nobmey
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 98 13:09:00 -0600
- Organization: PSL Online (713)442-0232 Houston, Texas
-=> Quoting Qov to Lisa Stapp <=-
Q> }HoS quvmoH wa'DIch.
Q> }naQ 'e' quvmoH cha'DIch.
Q> }quv'egh 'e' quvmoH chorghDIch.
Q> }(On my left hand, I have a replica of a Viking ring.
Q> }It's silver. Runes are inscribed into the ring. The
Q> }first honors "strength." The second, "wholeness."
Q> }The eighth honors the Self.)
Q> You know, I think this is a good place for {-ghach}. I read "the
Q> second honours its being whole" and "the third honours it honouring
Q> itself." This really is an instance of turning a verb into a noun
Q> concept, and one where you don't mind calling attention to the word, so
Q> {-ghach} seems like the right tool.
Q> {naQtaHghach} and {quv'eghghach} "wholeness" and "self honouring."
Q> Also consider {'oS} instead of {quvmoH}.
Does this mean that my quest of dedicating my entire life to
avoiding the dreaded -ghach is meaningless???
Q> }baghbogh *Celtic* tlhegh not rIn.
Q> Did I mispaste this when editing, or did you really write a sentence
Q> with the subject before the verb and the adverb after it?
jIQaghDI' jIQaghqu'.
Lisa Stapp
[email protected]
[email protected]
___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30 [NR]