tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 11 07:06:25 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: qaStaHvIS poH jIQubtaH
- From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: qaStaHvIS poH jIQubtaH
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 10:01:12 -0400
ghItlh charghwI'
>Oh, and as far as we know, there IS not transitive sense of
>{meQ}. All canon examples so far use it intransitively, so we
>know you can use {meQmoH} to get your meaning.
No. As I said, there's a transitive example of {meQ} in KGT, under
"Avoiding Gaffes": {to'waQ meQ vutwI'}.
Qapla'
qoror