tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 09 19:53:17 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: KGT confirmations

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: KGT confirmations
• Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 20:52:29 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja'pu' SuStel:
>Whether Klingon linguists care at all about actually classifying transitive
>and intransitive verbs as such is something I can't speak to . . .

ja' HetaQ:
>It does sound reasonable however I recall Marc saying, at qep'a' loSDIch
>that there was no such thing as transitivity in Klingon.  If I recall
>correctly he seemed somewhat perturbed that the issue was still coming up.

As I remember it, he said "There is no transitivity problem."
Sorry, charghwI'. :-)

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KGT confirmations
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: KGT confirmations
    • From: Chet Braun <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Wish List
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: lo' Orkand *German slang* mu'mey tlhInganHolDaq ?
• Prev by thread: RE: KGT confirmations
• Next by thread: Re: KGT confirmations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level