tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Oct 29 12:42:37 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: napbe' yIn
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: napbe' yIn
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:42:28 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- Priority: NORMAL
'oy'qu' porghwIj 'ach 'oy'wIj qaq law' 'oy'lIj qaq puS.
'oy'DI' nuv DaSaHbogh 'ej bIQaHlaHbe' bIDo'Ha'qu'. ram HoSlIj.
Hoch ra' San. bIloSlaH neH. bIloStaHvIS tIqmajDaq pItlhej,
jupwI'. bItulDI' Qoyjaj San.
charghwI'
On Tue, 28 Oct 1997 18:40:11 -0800 (PST) "Mark E. Shoulson"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> toH, wa'Hu' ram rop ghuHom 'e' wItu'. tuj porghDaj. vaj DaH ropyaHDaq
> ghaH, 'ej pa' ghaH je SoSDaj'e'. wa'SaD wa'maH jabbI'ID vIlaDnIS jIH, 'ej
> pawtaH latlh. 'ej DuSaQvaD jIvumnIS. napbe' yIn... 'a Dalbe' je! :) Dal
> pagh jagh. 'oy' vISIQtaH...
>
> ~mark