tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 08 06:18:37 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: "nuqneH" Sajatlh
- From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: "nuqneH" Sajatlh
- Date: 08 Mar 97 09:17:06 EST
ghunchu'wI' wrote:
>Actually, the example with {chen} is interesting. The "official"
definition of {chen} is "take form"; he is translating it instead
as "be formed".<
qoror here. I suppose you're right with that particular part, but some of them
are causing something to "do" and some are causing something to "be done."