tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 04 14:43:20 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: bom puqloDwI'!
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: bom puqloDwI'!
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 97 22:41:21 UT
jatlh Qob:
> QoQ *Qanqor* ta vIghaj 'ej wItlhej.
<*Qanqor* QoQ ta> yIjatlh. pagh <*Qanqor QoQ> yIjatlh. 'utbe'law' <ta> 'ej
moH.
> Note: I have never been able to come up with a good translation of
"conquest".
> {chargh} "conquer" is not quite right, nor is {charghwI'}: I need "the act
of
> conquering" not "one who conquers". The best I can do is {charghtaHghach},
> which is probably closest: "continuous conqueration". Comments?
mu'vam vIyaj. bIcharghtaHchugh, vaj mu' lugh 'oH <charghtaHghach>'e'.
bIcharghlI'chugh, vaj mu' lugh 'oH <charghlI'ghach>'e'. bIcharghta'chugh, vaj
mu' lugh 'oH <charghta'ghach>'e'. ghaytanHa' bIcharghpu'qu'.
> Also, I realize that my use of {tlhej} "accompany" is probably wrong, but it
> was all I could think of.
chaq loQ lugh. mayIttaHvIS, chotlhegh. maSoptaHvIS, chotlhegh. mabomtaHvIS,
chotlhegh.
chaq yIjatlh <*Qanqor* QoQ vIghaj 'ej wIQoytaHvIS mabom>.
> Finally, did {mu'IQmoH} make sense?
HIja'. "They make me sad."
> Did *any* of it make sense? <g>
Hoch vIyaj.
--
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 97174.4