tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 21 20:40:14 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: vegh
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: vegh
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 97 03:34:50 UT
[email protected] on behalf of Alan Anderson wrote:
> Robyn Stewart's idea of {lutu'lu'} as the Klingon version of "whom" got a
> nod and an explicit lack of contradiction. {naDev tlhInganpu' lutu'lu'}
> *is* grammatical, but the {lu-} is more often left off.
Grrr . . . Klingon is what taught me the difference between "who" and "whom,"
and ever since I figured it out I've been careful to use "whom" where it
belongs. But I don't *want* to say {lutu'lu'} . . .
{{:-P
--
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 97555.5