tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 23 01:43:29 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Another Attempt at Controversy

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Another Attempt at Controversy
• Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 04:42:57 -0500 (EST)

vagh tup vIjatlh did not get accepted
How about vagh tup jIjatlh, putting vagh tup as a time stamp?
Then, we could have vagh tup tlhIngan Hol paq vIlaDpu', correct?
The time stamps act in the position of adverbs, correct?

peHruS

• Prev by Date: _Inferno_ 3:1-9 (Re: Translation, please comment)
• Next by Date: Re: Online dictionaries and such
• Prev by thread: Re: Kai Kassai
• Next by thread: RE: Another Attempt at Controversy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level