tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 19 12:07:27 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: drinking
- From: "Donald E. Vick" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: drinking
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 11:27:22 -0800 (PST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "eric d. zay" at Feb 19, 97 10:08:24 am
> > >Yesterday I saw bodies all over the place but today warriors drink
> > >together.
> > >
> > >wa'Hu' lommey vIleghpu 'ach DaHjaj tlhutlh SuvwI'tay
> > >
> > >I don't know why I tried this sentence, but I ask you if anythings wrong
> > >with it?
>
> Since *mey* is the correct suffix for *lom*, it does not have the
> implication of being "scattered all over the place". To indicate this you
> could say:
>
> wa'Hu' Dat lommey tu'lu', DaHjaj tlhutlhDI' SuvwI'pu', tay'.
Shouldn't this be <DatDaq>? Dat is a noun, not an adverb.
>
> SuSvaj
wIvqu', law'wI'pu'vaD Holtej jIH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Thaddaeus Vick, Linguist to the Masses | [email protected] -or- |
| | [email protected] |
| I could be wrong. After all, there's | |
| a first time for everything. | http://www.crl.com/~dvick |
----------------------------------------------------------------------