ghItlh peHruS: >As to {latlh}, I submit substituting {chuvbogh} for "that which is left >over." No, "thing which is left over" would be {chuvwI'}. The controversial status of headless relative clauses isn't even an issue. >We may come up with tera'nganvaD chuvbogh Huch nobHa'. Yes, now that you've added a definite subject, {-bogh} makes sense. -- ghunchu'wI'