tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Dec 27 18:41:51 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: -vaD
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: -vaD
- Date: Sat, 27 Dec 1997 21:40:56 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- Priority: NORMAL
Please note that this was labeled KLBC. If you have remarks to
add AFTER THE BG IS FINISHED RESPONDING, they are welcome, but
to have several people redundantly offering the same advice as
the BG is not really helpful, especially when the BG chooses to
prod the beginner to fix it himself and another writer chooses
to finish it for him.
On Fri, 26 Dec 1997 20:54:16 -0800 (PST) WestphalWz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> In a message dated 97-12-25 02:01:05 EST, you write:
>
> << buQlu'mo' Sormey Sormey vI'oSmeH jIjatlh >>
>
> ------------------peHruS answers Scott D Randel's suggestion for
> "I speak for the trees."
>
> Sormey has to come as the object of buQlu'mo', giving us Sormey buQlu'mo' for
> the first clause. Then I suggest: Sormey buQlu'mo' Sormey 'oS SoQwIj
>
> peHruS
charghwI', taghwI' pabpo' ru'
Temporary Beginner's Grammarian, December 20-30