tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Aug 27 12:40:28 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Re: mu'tlheghmeywIj
- From: "Neal Schermerhorn" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Re: mu'tlheghmeywIj
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 15:42:34 -0400
ghItlh Qov (qoj qon Qov?):
>>majQa'! qarqu' tlhIngan Hol DaghItlhbogh. 'op Qaghmey lutu'lu', 'ach
>>lulughchoHmoHmeH Qov,
>
>qonlaw' Dawuq.
>
>Use ghItlh to refer the the act of marking, engraving and (possibly)
typing.
>Use qon to refer to actual composing, and when you mean both at once, use
qon.
lu'. 'ach *ghItlh* vIlo'ta' 'ej rur yojwIj yojlIj je.
I agree with the spirit of the correction - but I think the sentence in
question is still correct. My re-read implies that what I saw written was
quite accurate, not the composition of it. (I cannot count the times I've
typed differently than how I've composed!) (yIqaw, Qov - reH
jIlughbe'qang!) ('ej maQochbe'. mu'tlheghvamDaq pupbe' *ghItlh* 'ach *type*
'oSbogh mu''e' tu'lu'be'.)
BTW - the notes on qon - they're in Vol. 2 No. 4. I don't have it on hand,
but the source is in my dictionary.
>maj. bIloSta'mo' qaqunnISbe'.
not choqunnIS 'e' vItul! :)
Qermaq