tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Aug 20 19:56:23 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: adjectives
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: adjectives
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 22:57:59 -0400 ()
- Priority: NORMAL
On Wed, 20 Aug 1997 14:02:19 -0700 (PDT) [email protected] wrote:
> ghItlh charghwI' :
>
>
> > If this cryptic little critique was supposed to be pointing out
> > that the plural suffix is unnecessary, you should not that while
> > unnecessary, it is quite correct to include it anyway, as shown
> > in the TKD 5.2 - Numbers :-)
>
> Please don't take it too serious, I didna wanna upset you or something...
pIj jIQeHchoH, 'ach pIjHa' jIQeHtaH. bIlugh. jIQagh. qay'be'.
HIvqa' veqlargh!
> > In fact, I was quoting Marc Okrand from his audio tape,
> > Conversational Klingon.
> > If you had some other point to make, please make it more explicitly.
>
> Okay, more explicitly:
> {vagh} = five 5
> {jav} = six 6
The weird part was that in my head, I was saying "Six" in both
places. I got the Klingon part right. It was the Fed part I
screwed up on...
> > charghwI'
>
> ______________
> muHwI'
> Stardate 97637.5
>
charghwI'