tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 04 20:50:53 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: New word from Okrand
>Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 13:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
>From: [email protected]
>
>In a message dated 97-07-20 23:06:54 EDT, charghwI' writes:
>
><<
> A man's fist goes through a closed door, an arrow goes through a
> bird's heart or a woman goes through a forest.
> >>
>
>I thought "a woman goes through a forest" is okay as long as she does not go
>through any solid matter within that forest. She may even touch the trees,
>go through an open hole in a tree, but may not force her way through the pulp
>matter of the tree.
>
>What did I miss in the explanation? Other than that we are all to buy MO's
>new book as an answer to the word for "window." Perhaps he will even reveal
>soon the other word for "pass through" matter.
Well, Okrand DID say that passing through a forest was not an instance of
{vegh}. TO me, this business of focussing on touching matter or not
touching matter is splitting hairs (if I pass through a door but brush
against a cobweb on the way, it stops being vegh?) A forest is simply not
passed through like a doorway is. A forest is an obstacle, a doorway is an
opening. It's an aperture, and that's what vegh is all about: successfully
passing through something.
Why is it that all these posts sound to me like people saying "Oooh! I got
a new hammer! Where can I find more nails? What's this? A machine bolt?
Maybe it can be a nail too. And this snap fastener? I can use my new
hammer on it also! Great!" COme on, we got a new word, that doesn't mean
it's the greatest thing since sliced bread. Get over it and use it for
itself, not for a million other things.
~mark