tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Aug 03 08:38:56 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ghe''or 'elmeH vegh
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: ghe''or 'elmeH vegh
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 11:39:25 -0400 ()
- Priority: NORMAL
qaparHa'qu'taHvIS, qayajmeH Qatlhqu' Qu'. bIjatlhlaHchu' 'e'
vIHar, 'ach jabbI'IDmeylIj vIlaDbejDI' jISIvchoH. mu'tay' tIn
Daghaj 'ej pab Dayajbej, 'ach jabbI'ID DataDI' mISchoHlaw'
qechmeylIj.
charghwI'
On Tue, 29 Jul 1997 05:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Guido
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Seqram:
> >'elpa' Hoch, 'el? I know it's not specified, but -logh and -DIch on the
> >same word feels like two suffixes of the same type. It doesn't seem
> >right. -logh is multiplicity of times, and -DIch is ordinal... they don't
> >mix.
>
> ghunchu'wI':
> >ghe''or 'elbogh yInwI' wa'DIch ghaH. nap.
>
> nap 'a 'IHbejbe'. motlh neH mu'tlhegh. Ha' bomDaq motlhtaHvIS neH, Dal je
> mu'mey. mIw'e' chuppu'bogh Seqram vImaS, 'a chaq yajbe'lu'. "ghe''or 'el
> ghaH, 'elpa' Hoch yInwI'" 'oHchugh mu'tlhegh'e', tugh 'elrup je latlh
> yInwI', bong 'e' Qub'a' laDwI'. vaj wanI' tlhegh QubmoH'a' "-pa'" mojaq?
> toH, ghunchu'wI' vIHeQqanglaw', mu'Daq quqlaHbe'mo' -DIch -logh je. ngoDvam
> vIHarchoHmeH DIch chonob. vIpumlu'meH, "malglico" jIH, qar'a'? {{:-)
>
> toH, nuqDaq 'oHtaH ghe''or'e', 'ej chay' pIm ghe''or "Hell" je?
>
>
> |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> |~~~~G~~U~~I~~D~~O~~~~~~~
> |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> |
>