tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Apr 28 18:39:07 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: be'pu'
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: be'pu'
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 97 22:58:25 UT
Stardate 97323.1 jatlh charghwI':
> > > Hab QuchDaj 'e' Da wo'rIv jay'!
>
> net Sov.
>
> > jIQochbe', 'ach ngoDvam Harbe' *Kellie*.
>
> *Kellie* 'Iv?
qep'a' loSDIchDaq mutlhej *Kellie*.
> HoS'a'?
HoSbe' SomrawDaj, 'ach HoSqu' yabDaj. mulqu'. not jegh.
> 'IH'a'?
'e' Har loD law'. mach. Doq jIbDaj. Doj ngechDaj (Hey, we've got the word,
and she's the first to admit that it's true . . .).
> nayta''a'? tIn'a' loDnalDaj?
pagh nayta'. 'a Qup. cha'maH wa' ben bogh. SochHu' ghaH bangDaj je
luchevlu'. be' Qupqu' DamaS'a'?
nga'chuq *Kellie*, bangDaj mojHa'bogh loD'e' je, 'e' lumevbe'law'. munuQ
ghu'. val *Kellie* 'ej loD nIv jonlaH, 'ach qoHvetlh neHtaH!
--
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 97325.0