tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 27 23:56:55 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: be'pu' (was KLBC)
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: be'pu' (was KLBC)
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 02:58:29 -0400 ()
- Priority: NORMAL
On Sat, 19 Apr 1997 18:33:35 -0700 (PDT) DaQtIq
<[email protected]> wrote:
> jIHvaD jang charghwI':
...
> >> taghDI' DIS chu', mej Qov 'e' vIHar. Do'Ha'bej ghu'.
> >
> >jIQochbe' 'ach ghu'vam vIpIHta'. jatlhchu' 'ach reH <<jItaHbe'>>
> >nughuHmoH. nI'be' qImlaHghachDaj.
>
> Do'Ha' qarbej Qov.
>
> >[mu'wIj chu' DaparHa', qar'a'?]
>
> vIyajbej 'ej bIqarchu' 'ach <-ghach> lo'lu'DI' nogh DIrwIj.
qatlh nogh DIrlIj? <-ghach> lo'Ha' nuvpu' law' 'ach
vIlo'chu'ta'. lo'laH vay' 'ach yepnISlu'.
> >> ghaHvaD <lIy lut> vIngeH 'ach wej jIHvaD jang.
> >
> >not jang be'pu' 'IH.
>
> 'ach jang charghwI' 'IH.
chomonmoH. SoHvaD Ho'Du'wIj vISay'moH.
> - tlhaQ 'e' nIDbogh DaQtIq'e'
bIQapta'!
charghwI'