tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Apr 21 11:54:17 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: bo'DIjDaq jajmeywIj
- From: "Marc Paige"<[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: bo'DIjDaq jajmeywIj
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 13:40:55 -0500
ja' ghunchu'wI'
>>>
toH, Sughompa', SanDaj Sovlu'chu''a'?
'ej DIv'a' pumwI''e'? Hujlaw' ghu'vam.
><Texas>Daq maH vaj pumwI' Huplu' 'e' wIwuq
"Texas"-Daq qapumchugh 'ach bIDIvbe', jIH vIHuplu''a'?
<<<
ghobe'. bIDIvbe'chugh vaj vay' Hupbe'lu'
BTW, What should I have used instead of pumwI' for the "accused"?
pumwI' = accuser (wrong in my usage)
pummoHboghwI' ?= accused (i.e. one who causes accusation)
ghot pumlu' = person they accuse (I like this one the best so far)
He's not a <HeSwI'> until proven guilty right? (At least in the US system).
---------------
SI'IluD
wa'Hu' jIboghbe'