tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 03 09:57:27 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: double ways of seeing translation
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: double ways of seeing translation
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 97 13:17:05 UT
On Monday, March 31, 1997 4:30 PM, [email protected] on behalf of Mark E.
Shoulson wrote:
> (note, though, an exception: Qo'
> is both suffix and exclamation, with related meanings, and there's also taH
> as verb and suffix (not counting things like moH which have different
> meanings). But those exceptions do not prove anything generalizable.)
I agree, though there are a few others:
choH
laH
ta'
Daq
And don't forget items like
qa'meH vIttlhegh
(heh . . . I wonder if that's where {-qu'} comes from: make the preceding
element fierce.)
--
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 97250.0