tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Oct 01 08:02:12 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: DaH tlhIngan jIHbej
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: DaH tlhIngan jIHbej
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 10:58:43 -0400 ()
- Priority: NORMAL
On Mon, 30 Sep 1996 04:05:10 -0700 Robert Darke
<[email protected]> wrote:
> ghItlh SuStel:
...
> > > tlhIngan ghaHbej 'e' vItlhojpu' *Qanqor* vIleghDI'.
> >
> > "tlhoj"-Daq "pu'" DaghItlhlaHbe'. "'e'" ngaSbogh mu'tlheghDaq "-pu'"
> > ngaSlaHbe' wot cha'DIch. (Hey guys, am I allowed to do that with the
> > {mu'tlheghDaq}? I know it's been debated . . .)
>
>
> qayaj. DaH mu'tlheghwIj vIluDDI', vIyajbe' !
*luD*? *luD*? nuqjatlh? mu'vetlh vIghovbe'.
> QIt ghItlhwIj vIlaDnIS.
chaq QIt ghIthlIj DaghItlhnIS je. {{:)>
> nI'jaj yInlIj, 'ej batlh bIHeghjaj.
>
>
> Qorbeq
charghwI'