tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 06 18:02:32 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Two quick questions
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Two quick questions
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 21:02:00 -0500
Stardate 96849.3 jatlh ter'eS:
[jIjatlh]
> > No. Look on TKD 25: {-Daj} refers to "his," "her," or "its." This
suffix
> can
> > refer to objects as well as people.
>
> Actually, Okrand isn't consistent with this. In TKD, pages 162 and 165,
he
> defines it as "his/her" only. Is there any canon to clear this up?
I can't think of any offhand, but I would tend to believe the text rather
than the reference tables. Besides, I don't think Okrand would have
forgotten about this possibility and just left it out!
Can anyone think of a single canon example of Okrand using {-Daj} as "its"?
SuStel
Stardate 96851.4