tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 27 11:09:40 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC
- From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
- Subject: Re: KLBC
- Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 13:13:00 -0500
~mark writes:
> No offense to the esteemed Robyn, but along the lines of "Disengage
> cloaking device", you can always do "wovwI' yIchu'Ha'!"
marqoS replies:
>To me, {wovwI'} is "bright thing" - accurate, but not terribly precise.
>I think {wovmoHwI'} would be better.
{wov} sounds to me like it describes reflectivity, while {wew} is emmissive.
How about {wewwI'} or {wewqu'wI'}?
-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj