tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun May 26 01:45:53 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: How long have we been learning?
- From: [email protected] (Manic Paranoid)
- Subject: Re: KLBC: How long have we been learning?
- Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 18:45:55 +1000
Many persons hath written:
>> \ {How long have we been learning Klingon?}
>> This one translates nicely to a quantitative question:
>> qaStaHvIS poH 'ar tlhIngan Hol wIghoj?
charghwI' prompted:
> I'd probably use {DIS} or some other specific period of time
> rather than {poH}. Remember: A Klingon MAY be inaccurate, but
> he is NEVER appROXimate!
wa'Hu' cha'Hu' je mu'tlheghvam vIQoypu' 'e' vIQub. [monHom QIp]
voqHa'wI'
__ / __ / __ / __ / __ / __ / / __ /
/ / / / / __/ / / / / / / / / /
____/ __ / / __ / / / / / / __ /
__/ __/ __/__/ __/ __/__/ __/______/__/__/ __/ peQo' 'ach peQaw'