tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 03 23:22:41 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: "under" (was KLBC:Name that Song)
- From: Manic Paranoid <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: "under" (was KLBC:Name that Song)
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 16:23:21 -1000
At 10:09 PM 6/3/96 -0700, this was written:
[...]
>> Maybe {nagh bIngDaq} IS the object after all
> Interesting!! :)
> Until this discussion began, I, too, looked at Locative constructs at
> Adverbial clauses. That is because in Earth language they are Adverbial
> clauses. But, TKD pp27-28 clearly states [... bla bla bla ...]
> [...] I found this [the snipped bit] within Section 3.3.5.
> "Syntactic Markers."
> Contrary to my own belief up to now, I read in this passage that Locatives
> are Noun constructs, not Adverb constructs. Such Noun clauses would
> constitute an Object of a Verb.
I think [but am certainly no expert] that these things _are_ noun constructs,
but of course they are not objects of the verb. EVER. These locative noun
constructions are placed [only?] before the object of the verb. I suppose in
that respect they _are_ functioning as adverbials.
voqHa'wI'
__________
/ ______ /
/ / / /___ ______ ______ ______
Daniel Noll / / / __ //___ // __ // ____/
[email protected] / / / / / /____/ // / / / \ \
[email protected] / /____ / / / // __ // /_/ /___\ \
http://brucehall29.anu.edu.au/ /______//_/ /_//_/ /_//_____//_____/