tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jul 24 21:25:34 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: suffix-o-mania
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: suffix-o-mania
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 00:24:50 -0400
qaSDI' 96-07-24 21:14:47 EDT, jatlh vay':
> > I thought I understood, but the next posting I looked at contained the
> > sentence: <Saghbe'taH QujwI'pu'mo' vIng SuStel.> I would have put the
> > -mo' on the verb instead. Please explain more about -mo'.
jIvIngbe'qu'!!! <vIng SuStel> muja'qa' vay' vaj muSuvqangba' . . .
SuStel
Stardate 96564.4