tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 14 21:23:11 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC - subordinate clauses

• From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
• Subject: Re: KLBC - subordinate clauses
• Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:24:32 -0500

Lord Havelock writes:
>>I considered {nIteb} and rejected it because it seems to refer to
>>"doing" something on one's own.
>
>Of course the one is doing something on one's own. The one is dying
>on one's own.

The rest of my post explained my reasoning; I won't repeat it here.

>nIteb yIHeghbe'

If you use the imperative prefix {yI-}, you are supposed use the suffix
{-Qo'} instead of {-be'}.

-- ghunchu'wI'               batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC:qatlh jIH
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: 'to be Klingon' & some sentences
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC - subordinate clauses
• Next by thread: KLBC:1st Efforts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level