tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 16 19:06:20 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: jItlhob Hoch

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: jItlhob Hoch
• Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 22:07:18 -0500 ()
• Priority: NORMAL

On Sun, 15 Dec 1996 22:34:12 -0800 "eric d. zay" 
<[email protected]> wrote:
... 
> > The -rQ- or -rq- combination is not legitimate, is it?
> > I would guess Sark to transliterate as {SarIq}

or {Sargh}
 
> > jej

charghwI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: jItlhob Hoch
    • From: "Donald E. Vick" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Dr Okrand Speaks -- ben
• Next by Date: Re: Dr. Okrand Speaks
• Prev by thread: RE: jItlhob Hoch
• Next by thread: Re: jItlhob Hoch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level