tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 11 10:18:00 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: spammers
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: spammers
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 13:17:59 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (message from Qorbeq onTue, 10 Dec 1996 14:53:50 -0800)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 14:53:50 -0800
>From: Qorbeq <[email protected]>
>
>Qu' Qatlh Daghaj, 'ach batlh jabbI'IDghomvam Daquv.
More stuff...
Does he really "possess" the task? The English "have" is notoriously
polysemous (almost as much as "be"); I try not to rely on its multifarious
meanings in other languages. Probably "Qatlh Qu'lIj". cf. "Hab SoSlI'
Quch" instead of "?Quch Hab ghah SoSlI'". Second sentence I already
commented on.
>> Or, as someone once said... "Shit happens".
>
>
>{qaS wanI'mey jay'} yIjatlh'a'?!?
Make up your mind; is it a command or a question? I don't really
understand how an imperative and an interrogative can make sense together.
~mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQB1AwUBMq7608ppGeTJXWZ9AQHPfwL/Wk84IMTx6QzaOQOqwUhwzDGT4aOsO+bX
lNgbHnCnGleOJNUT9fD/2Fq5kj85XLT0FyDIEWFDch1VfFifbG07llNMoMptqgXQ
i/pxHWFh0OZVmL1t/K4H4QmSc0hunaV5
=nFrM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----