tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 19 18:10:32 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: wa'Hu' choS

• From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: wa'Hu' choS
• Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 21:10:28 -0400 (EDT)
• In-reply-to: <96Aug19.044856edt.35715@Lex_Lugar.cocci.com> (message fromDaQtIq on Mon, 19 Aug 1996 05:45:55 -0700)

>Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 05:45:55 -0700
>From: DaQtIq <[email protected]>

>William H. Martin wrote:

>> *bat*mey vIparHa'qu'. loSHu' ram juHwIj DungDaq Soch *bat*mey vIlegh.
>> ghewmeywIj yISop vIra'. juHwIj yIHub!

>'ej ~charghwI' lulob Hoch!

"lob" probably.  "Hoch" if anything is one of those irregular thingies that
construes singular, unless we know otherwise.

~mark

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: wa'Hu' choS
    • From: DaQtIq <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: wa'Hu' choS
    • From: DaQtIq <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: wa'Hu' choS
• Next by Date: Re: Hat tuj
• Prev by thread: Re: wa'Hu' choS
• Next by thread: Re: wa'Hu' choS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level