tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 12 21:49:17 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jajvetlh
- From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
- Subject: Re: jajvetlh
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 23:51:46 -0500
>With the Type 4 suffix on a Time Word in this passage, is this canon so that
>we too may now use {-vetlh} and {vam} on Time Words?
As long as they're used to refer to *previously mentioned* times, I think
they're appropriate. I don't believe they should be used to mean anything
like "this year" as in the year that is presently occurring.
>latlh: DaHjaj = today
> jajvam = this day DaH 'e' wItu'
> nuq bIH DaHjar'e' DaHDIS'e' je
>paghna' bIH'a' pagh potlhna' bIH'a'
jISovbe'. wej wIjanglu'.
-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj