tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 05 21:32:51 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: worn out (vavwI' loDnI')
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: worn out (vavwI' loDnI')
- Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 00:32:19 -0500
In a message dated 96-04-05 21:09:06 EST, tIm wrote:
>nIQopmoHlaH taHqeqpu' 'e' yIchaw'Qo'.
>
>lugh 'e' jItul
>tIm
>(With my luck "to hope" won't take the 'e' construction)
It does. But you got the prefix wrong. {lugh 'e' vItul}. I like the
sentence, though.
SuStel
Hovjaj 96263.4