tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 27 06:55:36 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: tlho'taHmeH jaj
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: tlho'taHmeH jaj
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 09:13:47 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (message from AlanAnderson on Wed, 22 Nov 1995 10:03:04 -0800)
>Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 10:03:04 -0800
>From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
>*USA*ngan juppu'wIj:
qatlh jutIch? jup*wI'* SoH 'e' vIHarpu'...
>tlho'taHghach yupma' botIvjaj.
I think I prefer tlho'meH yupma'. Adding -ghach may not be a Bad Thing,
but gratuitous -taH's just to add -ghach is cheap (it's an Esperantism,
based on the E-o habit of adding its continuous suffix, -ad, to verbs when
nouning them (marteli -> martelado).
~mark