tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 31 10:24:38 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: loDHompu'
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: loDHompu'
- Date: Wed, 31 May 95 13:24:36 EDT
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Alan Anderson" at May 31, 95 9:22 am
According to Alan Anderson:
>
> Perhaps {tlhIngan [cleavage]lIjvaD bIHem}? We don't have a trivial way
> to say "be proud of" something, so you can't translate it word-for-word.
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
Hmmm. Can we really consider the pride to be beneficial to the
cleavage? Is the pride intended for the cleavage? I think
{-mo'} is a much better suffix here.
charghwI'
--
\___
o_/ \
<\__,\
"> | Get a grip.
` |